Performance Test Configuration: Integrated Graphics


 Performance Test Configuration
Processor(s): Intel 2.8E Prescott (Retail)
Intel 2.8C Northwood (Retail)
RAM: 2 x 512MB OCZ PC3500 Platinum Ltd OR
2 x 512MB Mushkin PC3500 Level II
Hard Drive(s): Seagate 120GB 7200RPM (8Mb buffer)
Video AGP & IDE Bus Master Drivers: ATI Platform Driver 8.01 Beta
Intel Chipset Drivers
Video Card(s): Integrated 9100 IGP PRO (64MB Frame Buffer)
Integrated 865G (64MB Frame Buffer)
Video Drivers: ATI Catalyst 2.2 Platform
Intel Graphics Driver 14.1 (2/10/04)
Operating System(s): Windows XP Professional SP1
Motherboards: ATI 9100 IGP PRO Reference Board
Intel D865GBF (865G)

Benchmarks used either Mushkin PC3500 Level II or OCZ PC3500 Platinum Ltd memory modules. Both DIMMs use Winbond BH5 chips and perform virtually the same in our tests.

All performance tests were run with the onboard integrated graphics using a 64MB frame buffer for the fairest comparison. Intel 865G graphics have a maximum 64MB frame buffer while the ATI integrated 9100 graphics allow a frame buffer to 128MB. The AGP aperture was set to 256MB with Fast Write enabled. Resolution in all benchmarks is 1024x768x32 unless otherwise noted.

Additions to Performance Tests

Future Mark PCMark2004 is included to measure General Performance in addition to our standard Veritest Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2004 and Veritest Business Winstone 2004 for system benchmarking.

Game Benchmarks

Games were run in our standard motherboard test configurations except for Splinter Cell. Since Splinter Cell requires a 128MB frame buffer for High Shadow Resolution, we were forced to reduce Shadow Resolution to medium to allow the Splinter Cell benchmark to run. All other Splinter Cell settings are the same as used in other benchmark testing.

Comparing Integrated Graphics Integrated Graphics: General Performance and Media Encoding
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, May 5, 2004 - link

    My apologies. The chart was supplied by ATI and shows a Clock Speed of 300 and a Ramdac of 400.
  • SocrPlyr - Wednesday, May 5, 2004 - link

    The comparison sheet on page 10 definately has 400MHz for the RAMDAC...
    it is a picture, and pictures don't lie :)

    Josh
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    The comparison sheet on page 10 states the Ramdac speed is 300MHz, exactly what was stated when the review was published. Where is the comparison sheet that states 400 for the Ramdac speed?
  • quanta - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    Are you sure the RAMDAC on 9100 IGP Pro is really 400MHz? The ATI site says it is 300MHz, but the comparison sheet in your site says 400MHz.
  • gofor55 - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    Does anybody know whether 9100IGP Pro will run ATI's Multimedia Center 9.0 and EazyShare. This might be just the ticket for a low cost multimedia PC for living room and bedroom to view PVR captures from a networked media server.
  • Pumpkinierre - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    So Wesley any indications in that ATI note as to how they optimise for Prescott?
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    ATI confirmed SATA RAID was present on RS350, not AOpen. Must have been a petit mal . . .
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    #12 -
    AOpen has confirmed that RS350 DOES support SATA RAID 0,1. We confiormed SATA RAID works fine with a pair of WD Raptors in a stripe.

    The review will be updated to correct the SATA information.
  • Kai920 - Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - link

    #14 - Very well said.

    I like how IGPs keep improving --say goodbye to Intel Extreme Graphics 2 and onboard GF4MX. The IGP may very well be a major decision in my future purchases, if not the next.
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    #12 -
    Asute of you to catch the Sata RAID in the diagram. Unfortunately the diagram also shows IXP 300 when the board had an IXP 320.

    We have asked ATI for clarification on whether SATA RAID is an option. They are all in Barcelona, Spain for the big X800 kick-0ff tomorrow, so we might not have an answer for a few days.

    #10 -
    As for the comment about mfg suck-up, GET REAL. Mfgs HOPE they will get a good review from us because we are honest, but more often than not mfgs complain we are too negative in pointing out failings with their product. That means we probably have it about right.

    #4 - If you bothered to read the review you would have found the MAIN message was the RS350 competes very well with Intel AS A CHIPSET, which SHOULD be of interest to you. The other news was that Prescott optimizations make Prescott a better performer than Northwood on the new chips. Yes, we coverd Integrated Graphics, because it mattered, but that was not the main point. It wasn't a slow news day - the NDA expired at 6AM today, as the X800 NDA expires tomorrow. The RS350 is a damn good chipset or I wouldn't have bothered.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now