Audio Quality: RightMark Audio Analyzer 16/44.1

Here, we really need to look at the swept IMD test at the bottom of the page to see the problems with Creative's implementation. Note, also, that the Gina3G maintains a very flat frequency response. And though the Gina3G's noise and dynamic range numbers are "not as good" as the Creative cards, the behavior is more consistent across the audible spectrum.


TestEcho Audio Gina3GSB Audigy 2 ZS Platinum ProSB Audigy 4 ProIntel HD Audio
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB: +0.04, -0.09+0.13, -0.36+0.13, -0.36+0.25, -0.32
Noise level, dB (A): -94.3-95.6-94.5-87.8
Dynamic range, dB (A): 94.194.394.187.1
THD, %: 0.00570.00280.00330.0061
IMD, %: 0.00790.00760.00810.018
Stereo crosstalk, dB: -94.9-95.2-93.3-87.6

Spectrum graph
Frequency response

Spectrum graph
Noise level

Spectrum graph
Dynamic range

Spectrum graph
THD + Noise (at -3 dB FS)

Spectrum graph
Intermodulation distortion

Spectrum graph
Stereo crosstalk


Spectrum graph
IMD Sweep comparison


Note the flatness of the IMD sweep test on the Gina3G and the sharp contrast of the Intel and especially the Creative solutions. The range of frequencies graphed isn't very clearly labeled, but the graph starts at 2kHz and goes to 20kHz on the x-axis. As the value plotted on this graph represents the dB level of intermodulation distortion present in the signal when those frequencies are swept, and the signals are 1kHz apart, a large part of the distortion will be in the form of a 1kHz tone (F2 - F1). This is obviously bad and can indicate that even in audible high frequency data could cause problems right in prime listening space.

Audio Quality: RightMark Audio Analyzer 16/48 Audio Quality: Qualitative Analysis
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • DerekWilson - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    Sorry for the confusion guys,

    We had originally just picked on card from each end of the market (onboard, addin, pro) and then decided that we needed to do both the audigy 2 and 4 because they're so similar. It's really meant to be an intro piece on sound and a look at an example of each market segment.

    We certainly weren't trying to be all inclusive, and we do want your feedback. These cards will be our "comparison point" cards in each market segment. When we look at onboards solutions, we'll talk about how it compares to the ALC880, and on the Pro side, we'll match up the Gina3G with whatever we're looking at.

    And when we do a targeted review as for proaudio we will absolutely spend time setting up a workstation and running some latency tests and we'll talk about asio/gsif support more in depth.

    We will be reviewing more sound cards :-)

    We didn't want to review all of them at once and spoil the fun though. :-D
  • MarkM - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    I second #5's request -- esp concerning the onboard, which is more relevant for most new builds

    >on board nvidia audio would be interesting as well as an older sb live 5.1 card for reference
  • LoneWolf15 - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    Not a single card based on the VIA Envy24 setup...no M-Audio Revolution, no Terratec, no Chaintech AV-710 (all Envy24-based)...I can't believe Anandtech left one of the largest enthusiast chipsets out of the roundup. There's just not enough representation here of available solutions to make a good comparison, it's either Intel or Creative, and Intel isn't an option for AMD users.
    If you're going to make onboard comparisons, why not (even if it's a poor solution) add the ALC850 found on most Socket 754/939 boards, seeing as AMD users can't exactly get Intel/Azalia HD audio?
  • hondaman - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    More cards please!!! Soundstorm, older audigy/Live and m-audio sure would have made this article a whole lot better, as thats what a lot of people are using.
  • bob661 - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    If mid-range cards are an order of magnitude better in objective sound tests than onboard solutions, I might actually go back to buying sound cards.

    I would like to reaquest testing the onboard Realtek's on the Athlon64 motherboards. I would be interested in seeing how they perform compared to mid-range and high-end sound cards.
  • EddNog - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    Yep; gotta' have at least a halfway decent setup, from head to tail. I'm pretty happy with my setup:

    foobar2000 kernel streaming FLAC/Monkey's Audio to
    Echo Audio Mia MIDI with sample rate locked to 44.1, out via 75ohm impedance silver coax S/PDIF to
    Onkyo TX-SR501, out via silver cabling to
    a pair of Paradigm Studio/20 Rev. 3 sitting on
    Atlantis Reference stands

    "I'm lovin' it."

    -Ed
  • OrSin - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    Most people are not gaming with 800 sound cards.
    I would be suprised if gamers are using $100 sound cards. When people list out thier RIGS 8 out 10 don't even lsit thier sound card. And the other 2 have $100 or less cards. I'm all for a review of $200+ cards but almost all are not using them for gaming.

    Also in order to hear better sound from $100+ card you need a better and better speak system. Not just speaker, but a good in home setup. I threw down $1000 on a speak system and it sound ok. WhenI had my friend come over and setup it up right. It sounded great. It more then just buying them and plugging them in. It take a lot to get a quailty setup. High end sound cards only will not do it, so for some it just not worth going beyond a $100 card.
  • Araemo - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    [Self-serving]
    Could we get an onboard audio review for the Soundstorm on the Abit NF7-S v2? ;P[/self-serving]

    Seriously though, good review.. but I'd like to know where my current system stands.

    And does anybody know how much "THX Certified" is worth? I have logitech Z-2200s connected to my nForce onboard right now(My Audigy developed an odd crackling noise during gameplay that I couldn't get rid of.)
  • yodel - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

  • YellowWing - Thursday, February 3, 2005 - link

    What about AC3 digital encode? The next PC I build will be a HTPC, and digital encode for a single connection to my receiver is of great importance. I doubt if any of the sound systems analog sections would be used.

    What is the overhead of the digital encode? Does it slow a frame rate or not seem to matter?

    Can you hear the difference between the digital and analog output with a good home theater setup?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now