Looking Back Pt. 2: X800 & Catalyst Under The Knife
by Ryan Smith on February 22, 2006 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Battlefield 2
As the newest game in our latest investigation, Battlefield 2 is almost too new to include. With only a handful of drivers released in the lifetime of the game, there’s a lack of data points to work with to draw a strong conclusion, but given the number of requests to include this game, we have included it anyhow. As a primarily large multiplayer game, Battlefield 2 strikes an interesting balance between the desire for high quality graphics and the need to be able to render a large firefight without slowing a system to a crawl. Battlefield 2 also is a unique game out of everything that we’ve tested because it’s the only game here that requires pixel shading, whereas everything else merely uses the ability if it’s there.
As the newest game in our latest investigation, Battlefield 2 is almost too new to include. With only a handful of drivers released in the lifetime of the game, there’s a lack of data points to work with to draw a strong conclusion, but given the number of requests to include this game, we have included it anyhow. As a primarily large multiplayer game, Battlefield 2 strikes an interesting balance between the desire for high quality graphics and the need to be able to render a large firefight without slowing a system to a crawl. Battlefield 2 also is a unique game out of everything that we’ve tested because it’s the only game here that requires pixel shading, whereas everything else merely uses the ability if it’s there.
In spite of the lack of data points, the performance graph for Battlefield 2 is surprisingly boring. Outside of a performance improvement with the 5.07 drivers, the first drivers released after the game was launched, there’s a distinct lack of performance improvements. Considering how brutal that this game is, specifically, we would have expected a larger and more continuous performance improvement.
Catalyst 5.05 versus 6.01 (mouse over to see 5.05)
24 Comments
View All Comments
mino - Thursday, February 23, 2006 - link
What they can do is provide Control panel.Had they provided CP at least once a quarter, many customers would be happier and it would not require so much resources after all.
As a result of CCC being the only option, we have decided to abandon all planned purchases of X1000 based graphics cards recently.
The slowness is not the only issue, we've had also problems to meke CCC run at all(it is needed for multi-display configs).
MrJim - Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - link
Hopefully ATI will come to their senses about CCC, as its now it isnt working for the demanding users at all. Average joe maybe dont know you can replace CCC with ati tray tools to help speed up things and thats sad. Please bring back the old control panel, please?Lonyo - Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - link
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2701...">http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2701...The "mouseover" comparison at the bottom has one 3D Mark shot, and one HL2 shot.
Ryan Smith - Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - link
Fixed, thanks.