Looking Back Pt. 3: The 6800 Ultra, ForceWare, and the Future
by Ryan Smith on May 11, 2006 4:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
NV40 & The Test
Coming off of the extremely poor showing of their 5000 series and its associated Detonator drivers, the NV40 design represents an interesting design from NVIDIA born amid the bitter taste of driver scandals and overall inferior performance. NV40 not only brought the introduction of Shader Model 3.0, further blurring the lines between a CPU and a GPU with the addition of more high-level programming abilities, but also reintroduced the world to SLI when the NV40 went to PCI-Express. Overall the NV40 is a very different design than anything preceding it, giving NVIDIA a blank slate from which to work out performance improvements.It should be noted that our driver selection policy is a little different for NVIDIA than it was with ATI, due to NVIDIA's previously inconsistent official driver release schedule, which did not see official drivers released often enough to fill our intended 2-month gap between driver revisions. Because of this, some of the drivers used in this test are NVIDIA driver releases that were not directly released to the public by NVIDIA itself (e.g. releases by OEMs who received multiple NVIDIA builds). However given the simply enormous number of such drivers, we used only Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL) certified drivers, which means these are drivers NVIDIA was confident enough to release in a final form and submit to testing to Microsoft. Overall these drivers still stick to an approximate 2-month gap, making the results as comparable as possible with our ATI Catalyst results.
What hasn't changed is our primary game list, though we'll be adding a few additional titles with more limiting testing (see page 11). As with the X800 Pro, we'll be conducting extensive testing with the following games:
- X2: The Threat
- Doom 3
- Half-Life 2
- Far Cry
- Battlefield 2
- 3DMark05
- D3DAFTester
- Final Fantasy XI, Benchmark 2
- Need For Speed Underground 2
- The Chronicles of Riddick
- Serious Sam 2
Benchmarking Testbed | |
Processor: | AMD Athlon 64 3400+(S754) |
Motherboard: | Abit KV8-MAX3 |
Memory: | 2GB DDR400 RAM 2:2:2 |
Hard Drive: | 120GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 |
Power Supply: | Antec TruePower 430W |
All tests were done at 1280x1024 unless otherwise noted.
24 Comments
View All Comments
LoneWolf15 - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
Currently they are, yes. But some years back, they sucked.That's true. However, "some years back" is around the time of the Radeon 8500, far before the 9xxx line or the X800 line. This issue is no longer relevant, and yet people who haven't used ATI cards in years flog this dead horse over and over again.
ATI isn't perfect; their multimedia cards (i.e. TV tuners) still need work in the software department. However, it's been a long time since ATI has had serious driver issues, and many who haven't had an ATI card since Rage128/Radeon/Radeon 8500 days talk as if things haven't changed.
Powermoloch - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
I've been using Ati's drivers for quite sometime, and I noticed a gradual increase of performance from my experience. Especially on the 3dmark scores lol.MrKaz - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
What’s the problem with Control Panel?I like it a lot. Ati drop it in 5.11, I keep it installed with driver 6.4 and have no problems.
poohbear - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
have u even owned an ATI card? i'm currently running a 6800gt, but my experience w/ the 9800pro was great and i dont know what u're talking about w/ your driver instability comment. maybe u should read the article again, it praises ati's driver team quite a bit.