Intel P35 Memory Performance: A Closer Look
by Wesley Fink on May 18, 2007 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Number Crunching and Gaming
The only real improvement in our tests is a 16% to 18% improvement in memory bandwidth on P35, whether it is running DDR2 or DDR3. Does the memory bandwidth improvement translate into any real improvement in system performance? Where there are performance improvements are they likely attributable to the improved memory controller or the faster CPU bus?
SuperPi 1.5 at a 2M setting was run in all memory and speed configurations. This utility benchmarks system performance in pure number crunching as it calculates pi to the number of decimal points selected (in this case 2 million). SuperPi is a very simple program but due to the size of the data set memory performance is often a critical factor.
With all tests run with the same X6800 CPU at 10x266 and 8x333 processor speeds, there was no clear performance improvement in SuperPi. It is interesting that most of the best (lowest) SuperPi results were with the P35 at 1066 processor bus. In most cases SuperPi performed better at 10x266 2.66 than at 8x333 2.66 which was something of a surprise. SuperPi performance is a very slightly better as a result of the P35 controller. The 1333 performance is still a bit faster than the P965, but the faster processor bus seems to actually degrade SuperPi performance a tiny amount.
Gaming
A standardized game benchmark was chosen from our memory test suite to determine if the better P35 memory bandwidth improved gaming performance. The Far Cry - River demo was run for 3 loops and results in fps were averaged over the 3 runs. This benchmark was chosen because we are familiar with how it behaves in memory performance tests. A full suite of gaming tests will be run in the P35 performance launch on May 21st.
Using the same CPU for all tests actually shows greater improvements in gaming performance than was seen in the DDR3 vs. DDR2 review. As you can see in the comparisons above the P35 memory controller contributed 3 to 5% improvement in gaming performance. Our target DDR-800 results showed a 4.6% to 5.2% improvement, so we conclude the P35 memory controller improves gaming performance roughly 5%
Results below the 1333 line represent total improvement, which varied from about 4% to 6%. With the target DDR-800 performance improvement ranging from 5.4% to 5.7% total, and the memory controller alone contributing 5% improvement, we are left with about 0.5% performance improvement in gaming due to the higher processor bus.
These results were a bit of a surprise. Almost all of the improvement in real-world gaming came as a result of the improved P35 memory controller, with about half a percent attributable to the 1333 processor bus. The Far Cry benchmarks show most of the real world gaming improvements are the result of the P35 memory controller.
The only real improvement in our tests is a 16% to 18% improvement in memory bandwidth on P35, whether it is running DDR2 or DDR3. Does the memory bandwidth improvement translate into any real improvement in system performance? Where there are performance improvements are they likely attributable to the improved memory controller or the faster CPU bus?
SuperPi 1.5 at a 2M setting was run in all memory and speed configurations. This utility benchmarks system performance in pure number crunching as it calculates pi to the number of decimal points selected (in this case 2 million). SuperPi is a very simple program but due to the size of the data set memory performance is often a critical factor.
Super Pi 1.5 - 2.66GHz Time in Seconds - Lower is Better |
|||
Memory Speed | P965 ASUS P5B Dlx |
P35 DDR2 ASUS P5K Dlx |
P35 DDR3 ASUS P5K3 Dlx |
10 x 266 - 1066 FSB - 2.66GHz | |||
DDR2-800 3-3-3-9 | 46.05 | 45.59 (-1.0%) |
- |
DDR2-800 5-6-6-15 | 47.28 | - | |
DDR2-800 6-6-6-15 | - | 46.77 (-1.1%) |
- |
DDR3-800 6-6-6-15 | - | - | 46.95 (-0.7%) |
DDR2-1067 4-4-3-11 | 45.39 | 45.03 (-0.8%) |
- |
DDR2-1067 5-6-6-15 | 45.72 | - | - |
DDR2-1067 6-6-6-15 | - | 45.16 (-1.2%) |
|
DDR3-1067 7-7-7-20 | - | - | 46.03 (+0.7%) |
8x333 - 1333 FSB - 2.66GHz | |||
DDR2-800 3-3-3-9 | - | 45.78 (-0.6%) |
- |
DDR2-800 6-6-6-15 | - | 46.08 (-2.5%) |
- |
DDR3-800 6-6-6-15 | - | - | 46.89 (-0.8%) |
DDR2-1067 4-4-3-11 | - | 45.20 (-0.4%) |
- |
DDR2-1067 6-6-6-15 | - | 45.81 (-0.2%) |
- |
DDR3-1067 7-7-7-20 | - | - | 45.93 (-0.5%) |
DDR3-1333 9-9-9-25 | - | - | 45.77 |
With all tests run with the same X6800 CPU at 10x266 and 8x333 processor speeds, there was no clear performance improvement in SuperPi. It is interesting that most of the best (lowest) SuperPi results were with the P35 at 1066 processor bus. In most cases SuperPi performed better at 10x266 2.66 than at 8x333 2.66 which was something of a surprise. SuperPi performance is a very slightly better as a result of the P35 controller. The 1333 performance is still a bit faster than the P965, but the faster processor bus seems to actually degrade SuperPi performance a tiny amount.
Gaming
A standardized game benchmark was chosen from our memory test suite to determine if the better P35 memory bandwidth improved gaming performance. The Far Cry - River demo was run for 3 loops and results in fps were averaged over the 3 runs. This benchmark was chosen because we are familiar with how it behaves in memory performance tests. A full suite of gaming tests will be run in the P35 performance launch on May 21st.
Far Cry - HOC River Time in Frames Per Second - Higher is Better |
|||
Memory Speed | P965 ASUS P5B Dlx |
P35 DDR2 ASUS P5K Dlx |
P35 DDR3 ASUS P5K3 Dlx |
10 x 266 - 1066 FSB - 2.66GHz | |||
DDR2-800 3-3-3-9 | 101.26 | 106.01 (+4.7%) |
- |
DDR2-800 5-6-6-15 | 97.76 | - | |
DDR2-800 6-6-6-15 | - | 102.80 (+5.2%) |
- |
DDR3-800 6-6-6-15 | - | - | 102.29 (+4.6%) |
DDR2-1067 4-4-3-11 | 103.04 | 107.65 (+4.5%) |
- |
DDR2-1067 5-6-6-15 | 102 | - | - |
DDR2-1067 6-6-6-15 | - | 106.06 (+4.0%) |
|
DDR3-1067 7-7-7-20 | - | - | 104.62 (2.6%) |
8x333 - 1333 FSB - 2.66GHz | |||
DDR2-800 3-3-3-9 | - | 106.30 (+5.0%) |
- |
DDR2-800 6-6-6-15 | - | 103.01 (+5.4%) |
- |
DDR3-800 6-6-6-15 | - | - | 103.39 (+5.7%) |
DDR2-1067 4-4-3-11 | - | 108.00 (+4.8%) |
- |
DDR2-1067 6-6-6-15 | - | 106.61 (+4.5%) |
- |
DDR3-1067 7-7-7-20 | - | - | 105.87 (+3.8%) |
DDR3-1333 9-9-9-25 | - | - | 106.7 |
Using the same CPU for all tests actually shows greater improvements in gaming performance than was seen in the DDR3 vs. DDR2 review. As you can see in the comparisons above the P35 memory controller contributed 3 to 5% improvement in gaming performance. Our target DDR-800 results showed a 4.6% to 5.2% improvement, so we conclude the P35 memory controller improves gaming performance roughly 5%
Results below the 1333 line represent total improvement, which varied from about 4% to 6%. With the target DDR-800 performance improvement ranging from 5.4% to 5.7% total, and the memory controller alone contributing 5% improvement, we are left with about 0.5% performance improvement in gaming due to the higher processor bus.
These results were a bit of a surprise. Almost all of the improvement in real-world gaming came as a result of the improved P35 memory controller, with about half a percent attributable to the 1333 processor bus. The Far Cry benchmarks show most of the real world gaming improvements are the result of the P35 memory controller.
14 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
We don't generally used beta drivers unless there is no other viable option (i.e. a new graphics card where the non-beta drivers are not yet available). I don't really expect the later drivers to improve performance, but perhaps that's something Gary will be looking at in our official P35 chipset article. Check back next week. :-)rjm55 - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
I was fairly convinced that the increases you saw the first time were just the 1333 speed. Looks like I was wrong. Thanks for doing more testing that shows the P35 is a better performer and the reasons are the memory controller by itself in gaming. This should shut up the no-difference posters.sdsdv10 - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
Agreed. Article like this is why AnandTech is one of best tech sites on the web!sdsdv10 - Friday, May 18, 2007 - link
Ummm...Article --> Articles
While they maybe one the best, the comment section could still use a edit function dammit.