Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and Massive Price Cuts
by Anand Lal Shimpi on July 16, 2007 3:04 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Once More, With Feeling
We've already been through one major set of Intel price cuts this year, that was just three months ago after the Core 2 QX6800 launch. The smoke hadn't even cleared from the first round but both AMD and Intel are back in price slashing mode.
AMD already cut its prices before today's article, while Intel's cuts aren't scheduled to take effect until July 22nd (next week). We'll start off with AMD's pricing:
CPU | Clock Speed | L2 Cache | Price |
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 | 3.0GHz | 1MBx2 | $599/pair |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | 3.0GHz | 1MBx2 | $178 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ | 2.8GHz | 1MBx2 | $157 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | 2.6GHz | 1MBx2 | $136 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | 2.6GHz | 512KBx2 | $125 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ | 2.5GHz | 512KBx2 | $115 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | 2.3GHz | 512KBx2 | $94 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | 2.1GHz | 512KBx2 | $73 |
AMD X2 BE-2350 | 2.1GHz | 512KBx2 | $91 |
AMD X2 BE-2300 | 1.9GHz | 512KBx2 | $73 |
Hello savings! The fastest Socket-AM2 processor AMD offers now costs less than $200, and only two of AMD's processors sell for over $150. Competition may not be good for AMD's bottom line but it's definitely enabling cheap system builds this year.
As exciting as a $1,000 CPU running a whole 70MHz faster than its predecessor may be, the real story today is how AMD and Intel stack up when you take the latest round of price cuts into account.
Intel's lineup looks very confusing at first, but after the price cuts take effect it'll be a lot easier to recommend processors. The table below has all currently available Intel CPUs (as well as a few that are due out soon), but you'll notice that some lines are in red. The lines in red are products that are available in the market, but no longer make sense to buy after the price cuts next week.
In an attempt to quickly move the market to 1333MHz FSB platforms, Intel has made those chips far more attractive than the previous 1066MHz FSB processors:
CPU | Clock Speed | FSB | L2 Cache | Availability | Pricing |
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 | 3.00GHz | 1333 | 4MBx2 | Now | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 | 2.93GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 | 2.66GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 | 2.93GHz | 1066 | 4MB | Now | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 2.66GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $530 |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | 2.40GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $266 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 | 3.00GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $266 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 | 2.66GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $183 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 | 2.66GHz | 1066 | 4MB | Now | $316 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | 2.40GHz | 1066 | 4MB | Now | $224 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 | 2.33GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $163 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6540 | 2.33GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $163 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 | 2.13GHz | 1066 | 4MB | Now | $183 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 | 2.13GHz | 1066 | 2MB | Now | $183 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 | 1.86GHz | 1066 | 4MB | Now | $163 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 | 1.86GHz | 1066 | 2MB | Now | $163 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 | 2.40GHz | 800 | 2MB | Q4 | $133 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 | 2.20GHz | 800 | 2MB | Q3 | $133 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 | 2.00GHz | 800 | 2MB | Now | $113 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 | 1.80GHz | 800 | 2MB | Now | $113 |
Intel Pentium E2180 | 2.00GHz | 800 | 1MB | Q4 | $84 |
Intel Pentium E2160 | 1.80GHz | 800 | 1MB | Now | $84 |
Intel Pentium E2140 | 1.60GHz | 800 | 1MB | Now | $74 |
See a trend? Financially it makes no sense to buy any of the 1066MHz FSB CPUs anymore, Intel sure knows how to push new chipsets on a market.
If you remove all the CPUs that no longer make sense to buy from the chart, you actually get a pretty nice and simple processor lineup:
CPU | Clock Speed | FSB | L2 Cache | Availability | Pricing |
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 | 3.00GHz | 1333 | 4MBx2 | Now | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 | 2.93GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $999 |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 2.66GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $530 |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | 2.40GHz | 1066 | 4MBx2 | Now | $266 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 | 3.00GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $266 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 | 2.66GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $183 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 | 2.33GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $163 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6540 | 2.33GHz | 1333 | 4MB | Now | $163 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 | 2.40GHz | 800 | 2MB | Q4 | $133 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 | 2.20GHz | 800 | 2MB | Q3 | $133 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 | 2.00GHz | 800 | 2MB | Now | $113 |
Intel Pentium E2180 | 2.00GHz | 800 | 1MB | Q4 | $84 |
Intel Pentium E2160 | 1.80GHz | 800 | 1MB | Now | $84 |
Intel Pentium E2140 | 1.60GHz | 800 | 1MB | Now | $74 |
It's almost like the early days of the Core 2, when model numbers weren't overly confusing for end users, almost.
Motherboard Requirements for 1333MHz FSB?
While there's no official support for 1333MHz FSB CPUs on Intel's P965 and 975X chipsets, many high end P965 motherboards provide unofficial support with little more than a BIOS update. Obviously if you're building a new system today, Intel's 3-series chipsets all enable the 1333MHz FSB and are available with both DDR2 and DDR3 support. We tested with Gigabyte's GA-P35C-DS3R, which offers four DDR2 and two DDR3 slots, giving you the option of either memory technology.
NVIDIA is quick to point out that all of its 680i based motherboards not only support the 1333MHz FSB but will also support Intel's forthcoming Penryn core, all that's necessary is a BIOS update. Motherboards based on Intel's 3-series chipsets should support Penryn just fine, but the verdict isn't out yet on what P965 boards will work with Intel's first 45nm core due out at the end of this year.
68 Comments
View All Comments
Darkmatterx76 - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
Nice article. I would like to point out 1 small inconsistancy. On page 12, 4th graph down you have the order for that particular "Lower is better" reversed compared to the others in the article.Also, I do have 1 question. Any idea when Intel will offer non-extreme quad cores at 1333 FSB?
zsdersw - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
I don't get it. Both are listed as 2.33GHz with 1333FSB and both with 4MB. What's the use of having two models?zsdersw - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
Nevermind. I found the answer. The 6540 doesn't have Intel Trust Execution technology.. or so I read elsewhere.jay401 - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
So how does the E6850 ($266 3.0GHz 1333fsb) compare to my existing E4400 ($133 running 1333MHz fsb with a 9x multiplier = 3.0GHz)?That's the test I'd like to see. Half the price but half the cache: Which is better.
bobbyto34 - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
Your o/c CPU might just be a little hotter :)Otherwise, it should have the same performance approximatively (less cache in E4xxx). But other tests showed that the E4300@3Ghz and could approach the performance of the X6800 !
lplatypus - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
Here's a little error I spotted on page 2, in case you want to fix it: the QX6850 is not 7MHz faster than the QX6800; it is 70Mhz faster.Gary Key - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
Fixed.96redformula - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
I also think the scale would be better from -100 to 100. It makes it easier to distinguish and more visually pleasing.ManuelX - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
I don't post here much but I had to this time. I simply loved the article. The logic behind the comparison was explained nicely, and the comparisons themselves were super easy to grasp. Good stuff.just4U - Monday, July 16, 2007 - link
I am going to have to agree here. Nicely laid out article with easy comprehensive graph comparison(s). Well done Guys!