PhysX in Sacred 2: There, but not tremendously valuable

The first title on the chopping block? Sacred 2.

This was Ben’s type of game. It’s a Diablo-style RPG. It’s got a Metacritic score of 71 out of 100, which indicates “mixed or average reviews”.

I let ben play Sacred 2 for a while, first with PhysX disabled and then with it enabled. His response after it was enabled? “The game feels a little choppier but I don’t really notice anything.”

Derek and I were hovering over his shoulder at times and eventually Derek pointed out the leaves blowing in the wind. “Did they do that before?”, Derek asked. “I didn’t even notice them”, was Ben’s reply.


Sacred 2 without GPU accelerated PhysX


Sacred 2 with GPU accelerated PhysX - It's more noticeable here than in the game itself

We left Ben alone for him to play for a while. His verdict mirrored ours. The GPU accelerated PhysX effects in Sacred 2 were hardly noticeable, and when they were, they didn’t really do anything for the game at all. To NVIDIA’s credit, a Diablo-style RPG isn’t really the best place for showing off GPU accelerated physics.

Ben wanted a different style of game, something more actiony. He needed explosions, perhaps that would convince him (and all of us) of the value of GPU-accelerated PhysX. We moved to the next game on the list.

The Widespread Support Fallacy PhysX in Warmonger: Fail
Comments Locked

294 Comments

View All Comments

  • tamalero - Thursday, April 9, 2009 - link

    the 270 is a 285 nerf, so what?

    your point is?
  • SiliconDoc - Thursday, April 23, 2009 - link

    The other point is, when you've been whining about nvidia having a giant brute force core that costs too much to make, and how that gives ati a huge price and profit advantage ( even though ati has been losing a billion a year) , that when ati make a larger core and moer expensive breadboard and cooler setup standard for their rebrand, you point out the greater expense, in order to at least appear fair, and not be a red raging rooster rooter.
    Got it there bub ?
    Sure hope so.
    Next time I'll have to start charging you for tutoring and reading comprehension lessens.
  • SiliconDoc - Thursday, April 23, 2009 - link

    Uh, for you, the mentally handicapped, the point is since ati made a rebrand, call it a rebrand, especially when you've been screeching like a 2 year old about nvidia rebrands, otherwise you're a lying sack of red rooster crap, which you apparently are.
    Welcome to the club, dumb dumb.
    I hope that helps with your mental problem, your absolute inability to comprehend the simplest of points. I would like to give you credit and just claim you're being a smart aleck, but it appears you are serious and haven't got clue one. I do feel sorry for you. Must be tough being that stupid.
  • Griswold - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - link

    Just that one "rebadge" comes with 3 million extra transistors; deal with it.
  • SiliconDoc - Monday, April 6, 2009 - link

    " Because they’re so similar, the Radeon 4870 and 4890 can be combined together for mix-and-match CrossFire, just like the 4850 and 4870."

    Yep, that non rebadge. LOL
  • jtleon - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - link

    Visit:

    http://chhosting.org/index.php?topic=24.0">http://chhosting.org/index.php?topic=24.0

    To see AO applied to FEAR. Boris Vorontsov developed the directx mod long ago!
  • SiliconDoc - Monday, April 6, 2009 - link

    Oh sorry, forgot forced SLI profiles, and I don't want to fail to mention something like EVGA's early release NVidia game drivers for games on DAY ONE. lol
    Aww, red rover red rover send the crying red rooster right over.
    Did I mention ati lost a billion bucks two years in a row for amd ?
    No ?
    I guess Dewreck and anand forgot to mention the larger die, and more expensive components on the 790 ati boards will knock down "the profits" for ati. LOL Yeah, awww... we just won't mention cost when ati's goes up - another red rooster sin by omission.
    I ought to face it, there are so many, I can't even keep up anymore.
    They should get ready for NVidia stiffing them again, they certainly deserve it - although it is funny watching anand wince in text as he got addicted to Mirror's Edge - then declared "meh" for nvidia.
    lol - it's so PATHETIC.
  • tamalero - Thursday, April 9, 2009 - link

    what the hell are you talking about?
  • SiliconDoc - Thursday, April 23, 2009 - link

    You proved you can't read and comprehend properly on the former page, where I had to correct you in your attempt to whine at me - so forget it - since you can't read properly ok nummy ?
  • SiliconDoc - Monday, April 6, 2009 - link

    Ahh, thank you very much. lol
    NVIDIA wins again !
    rofl
    I'm sure the ati card buyers will just hate it...but of course they are so happy with their pathetic "only does framerates, formerly in 2560 for wins, now in lesser resolutions for the win"
    It just never ends - Cuda, PhySx, Ambient Occlusion, bababoom, the vReveal, the game presets INCLUDED in the driver, the ability to use your old 8 or 9 Nvidia card for PhysX or Cuda in a xfire board with another NVidia card for main gaming ...
    I know, NONE OF IT MATTERS !
    The red rooster fanbois hate all of that ! They prefer a few extra frames at way above playable framerates in certain resolutions depending on their fanboy perspective of the card release (formerly 2560 now just lower resolutions)- LOL that they cannot even notice unless they are gawking at the yellow fraps number while they get buzzed down in cold blood in the game.
    Ahhh, the sweet taste of victory at every turn.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now