HAWX

HAWX is a game that’s not particularly GPU-bound, which means we can turn in some high numbers.

Once again Gigabyte’s GTX260 Super Overclock does well here, only falling behind the GTX275 at 2560x1600. Interestingly, the performance delta between it and the GTX275 changes with the inverse of the resolution, giving it a more noticeable lead at 1680x1050.

BattleForge Dawn of War II
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jamahl - Sunday, October 11, 2009 - link

    It must be difficult to review fairly right now but this was a nice review.

    I do feel that the overall recommendation should be towards the 5850 more strongly. Yes it is priced a little higher, yes it is "only" 25% faster and 30% more costly, but the additional features double that 25% faster and we all know this.

    I suspect the 5850 is going to increase the gap as time goes on, and I believe most of us will agree with that too.

    A more forceful point on the pricing of this card (the 260 being reviewed) would have been another alternative. Overall it was a decent and interesting review.
  • DC 10 - Saturday, December 26, 2009 - link

    This Review was a long time in the coming!!!

    Yet this review seems to almost seems to have a chip on it's shoulder - when it is clearly seen to be just as good card as a GTX275-280 - I got the impression that it was regrettable that this card was too good - kinda silly to me

    I have the MSI GTX260 OCv3 and It's OC'd to 690 on the core / 1436 shader / and 1200 mem clock- It pretty much comes close to a GTX280 -

    Anything in the GTX275-280 range this card or MY MSI Card which is the same as this card, but with Better Cooling (not factory cooling) should be considered easily.

    FYI - MSI did a great job by going with a Non traditional cooling setup for their OCV3 cards - especially SLI or Tri-SLI - This card reviewed and my MSI card simply reveal what is at stake here - Pricing and Marketing...

    The review showed what most of us already knew who own these cards - That NVidia could slash prices the way AMD has done - instead of being uppidy knuckle-heads...

    It's good to see Anandtech - review something like this - could not deny what these cards cand do price/performance wise - hard to ignore...
  • yacoub - Sunday, October 11, 2009 - link

    I dunno, the 5770 is shaping up nicely for a $160 card:
    http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33953...">http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33953...
    http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1458978">http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1458978
    http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15876/1/">http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15876/1/
  • palladium - Monday, October 12, 2009 - link

    Hmm... wonder how SiliconDoc would reply to this.
  • The0ne - Monday, October 12, 2009 - link

    Why would you even care? O.o
  • teohhanhui - Monday, October 12, 2009 - link

    He's got an appointment with the psychiatrist.
  • sparkuss - Sunday, October 11, 2009 - link

    Is there something I should read into this difference in the charts?

    I'm probably going to update to 5850/5870 before a full box upgrade and I'm following all the reviews I can find.
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, October 11, 2009 - link

    The 5850 data has been added. We pruned some old data to keep the charts smaller, and I pruned a little too much there.

    As for the 5870; Anand and I have matching rigs, but it's not possible to replicate thermal/noise characteristics. He did the noise/thermal testing for the 5800 series articles, while I did this one. As a result new data based on the cards I have was collected, and at the moment I don't have a 5870.
  • sparkuss - Sunday, October 11, 2009 - link

    Thanks,

    Just wanted to be sure I didn't miss something in the text.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now